Friday, July 18, 2008

I don't understand WHY...

WHY do some people of Malaysia act and talk like little children?? What happened to those things we learned in primary school??

PUNCTUALITY.
On why Anwar was arrested an hour before he was to report himself to the police, Najib said the police had explained this, adding: “Does it make so much difference, another half an hour or 45 minutes?” (http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2008/7/18/nation/21855279&sec=nation)
If the school starts at 7.30am, and you reach at 7.40am. You'll be punished. Coz 10minutes makes a big difference. Even school children understand this, how can these "smart" people not understand them? Try asking a business man - is 45minutes important to him? Talk to the MAS, the flight companies - try arguing with them, “Does it make so much difference, another half an hour or 45 minutes?” -sigh- dear dear...

HONEST TO THE TRUTH
I remembered as a school prefect, when we "arrest" an "incriminated" student, we must first produce and show them the "crime report". Without the report - we have no proof. Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim lashed out at the police saying that to date they have not given him a copy of the police report of the sodomy allegation made by his accuser Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan.... ...If they give the report to me now, how am I supposed to know that it is the original? Are they waiting to make up the ‘perfect’ police report?” he asked, adding that each time he sought a copy, the police said they had been instructed against giving him the report... The question now is, Who instructed them not to give him a copy of the report, and WHAT WERE THE REASONS - too good to be revealed?

What is so highly secretive in the report?? I won't blame Anwar for saying, "Is it so that they can keep amending and amending and amending it to fit in with the statement that I have just given to the police?" Anyone in their right mind would think the same too.

DON"T WE HAVE ARCHIVE?
I noticed that in overseas, eg HongKong, they keep their people's DNA forever. So that in future - whether 10 years or 20 years down the road, they are still able to track the person via DNA. What about Malaysia? Don't we do the same thing? I'm sure our technology is rather competitive... but why request for Anwar's DNA again, since they have taken them just 10 years ago???? They could have easily charged Anwar based on his DNA 10 years ago (DNAs never change, fyi). Why didn't they do so????

Asked if the police could not compare the DNA sample in the sodomy allegation to the one gathered from Anwar back in 1998, Syed Hamid said it was best to get a fresh sample. "http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2008/7/18/nation/21855903&sec=nation" Who says tat only fresh DNA serves its purpose? Dear Home Minister, do you kow tat DNAs never change, now and forever - it is the only one thing on earth which is exclusive to an individual. What happened to the DNA taken from Anwar 10 years ago? Did someone fabricated the records? or worse, deleted them? If he insisted on a "FRESH" DNA, i'm pretty sure that 10 years ago when they analyzed the DNA, it was still in "Fresh" condition. so... wat's the issue here????????????????????

Sometimes it's either we don't understand why these people are behaving the way they do now, or our guesses of their motives could be rite (then we'll understand why they're doing this - simple).

No comments: